There is a theme that heats up the Korean community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It’s HYBE VS MINHEEJIN’s topic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is still a battle between each other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nothing has been decided yet, but it’s still in the dark.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this regard, it is an issue because a former lawyer mentioned the HYBE controversy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The reason for this controversy is that HYBE causes the incident first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Min Hee-jin didn’t start it first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
They could have quietly solved the company’s problems internally, but why would they bother to let it out?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HYBE said first that Min Hee-jin aims to take over HYBE management control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But the rationale is lacking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this situation, HYBE is playing the press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We are using the press team to generate news articles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Where is the source of the content in the article? Is it accurate?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Recently, there have been articles saying that HYBE lied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is because the contract between Min Hee-jin and HYBE was disclosed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
They said it was not a slave contract, but when they looked at the contents of the contract, the contents were different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If she has even 0.1% of HYBE shares, it is a clause that prohibits concurrent employment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HYBE, however, said it would not be subject to a concurrent employment ban from November 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Doesn’t that make sense?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In addition, in the case of 4.5% of the remaining stake, the stock cannot be sold without HYBE consent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She can’t even dispose of her shares as she wants, and if she has stocks, she can’t work as a concurrent job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Isn’t this an unfair contract to keep her?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Therefore, it seems that the majority of the opinion that Min Hee-jin is right in Korea right now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But their battle is not over yet. It continues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"